My Photo

counts


« Save Boston! | Main | In Memoriam »

Saturday, February 10, 2007

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

scott

JACK CAFFERTY: Is Anna Nicole Smith still dead, Wolf?

WOLF BLITZER: Yes, we’re going to be updating our viewers shortly on—

CAFFERTY: Can’t wait for that.

BLITZER: —the mysterious circumstance surrounding that. Jack, thank you.

DT

Barakh Obama is on the way, baby. Everything's gonna be allllllll-riiiiiiiight.

Tom E.

The other day, CNN.com had one of their red breaking news banners spread across the top of their home page announcing that there was nothing significant found in Smith's autopsy. That's right, the fact that there was no news was breaking news.

J

This is all one big head game.

The news is behavioral conditioning at its best. They give you reinforcement in the form of some big headline that they know nothing about. Then, while gradually feeding you increasing amounts of negative reinforcement by way of annoying commercials, they slip in these little teaser reinforcements. Research has shown that unpredictable and non-contingent reinforcement schedules is critical in building addiction and highly critical in getting you to take the highest dosage of negative reinforcement. So it behooves them to tease you and act like they're telling you something when they know nothing because that's the surest way to keep you watching and to keep you tuned into the commercials.

Additionally, rapidly flashing lights tend to captivate the attention centers in our brain. I've long believed that those flashing news banners could potentially harm people.

Then there's the emotional content of the real news. So you see how defense mechanisms come into play? Do you see how "Anna Nicole" functions as a form of avoidance coping? Do you see how it lets us separate ourselves from problems in general because it's so sensationalist that it could never happen to us. Do you see how it's so trivial and, in a sense, so preventable that it makes us feel in control?

Like I said, it's all one big head game. Just stick to NPR or college news radio. At least you won't end up with ADD.

J

This is all one big head game.

The news is behavioral conditioning at its best. They give you reinforcement in the form of some big headline that they know nothing about. Then, while gradually feeding you increasing amounts of negative reinforcement by way of annoying commercials, they slip in these little teaser reinforcements. Research has shown that unpredictable and non-contingent reinforcement schedules is critical in building addiction and highly critical in getting you to take the highest dosage of negative reinforcement. So it behooves them to tease you and act like they're telling you something when they know nothing because that's the surest way to keep you watching and to keep you tuned into the commercials.

Additionally, rapidly flashing lights tend to captivate the attention centers in our brain. I've long believed that those flashing news banners could potentially harm people.

Then there's the emotional content of the real news. So you see how defense mechanisms come into play? Do you see how "Anna Nicole" functions as a form of avoidance coping? Do you see how it lets us separate ourselves from problems in general because it's so sensationalist that it could never happen to us. Do you see how it's so trivial and, in a sense, so preventable that it makes us feel in control?

Like I said, it's all one big head game. Just stick to NPR or college news radio. At least you won't end up with ADD.

Steve the LLamabutcher

Just as long as the news doesn't report anything about the missiles downing copters coming from Iran. Because that would just harsh the meta-narrative.

scott

Osama bin Laden may finally be making that comeback we've all been wetting our beds over for years. And what do we do about it?

We gaze at Anna Nicole's purty corpse and Britney's bald head.

From Anna to Britney to Zawahri
By Bob Hebert
Have they buried Anna Nicole Smith yet?

Are you kidding? Ms. Smith may be dead and rapidly decomposing, but there’s too much fun still to be reaped from her story to let it die just yet. This is world-class entertainment: Larry King, “Today,” CNN, The New York Times.

Even the judge in the televised hearing over what to do with Ms. Smith’s remains is milking his 15 minutes, like Judge Ito of O. J. Simpson fame. In a burst of wisdom from the bench, the judge, Larry Seidlin, said, “Like a Muhammad Ali fight, sometimes you have to wait the whole 10 rounds.”

When we were kids we were taught not to laugh at people who were obviously mentally or emotionally disturbed. With Ms. Smith, who was deeply and unmistakably disturbed, we put her on television and laughed and laughed. Would she say something stupid, or spill out of her dress, or pass out in public from booze or drugs? How hysterically funny!

Then her son died. Then she died, leaving an orphaned infant daughter. Instead of turning away chastened, shamed, we homed in like happy vultures. Whatever entertainment value Ms. Smith had when she was alive increased exponentially when she was kind enough to die for us. Now she’s on the tube around the clock.

The story, as they say, has legs.

There are other stories out there, but they aren’t nearly as much fun. The Times reported on Monday, for example, that Al Qaeda is getting its act together in Pakistan and is setting up training camps in an area that, apparently, we don’t dare trespass in.

According to the article, “American officials said there was mounting evidence that Osama bin Laden and his deputy, Ayman al-Zawahri, had been steadily building an operations hub in the mountainous Pakistani tribal area of North Waziristan.”

The article went on to say, ominously, “The United States has also identified several new Qaeda compounds in North Waziristan, including one that officials said might be training operatives for strikes against targets beyond Afghanistan.”

I imagine that there are a fair number of television viewers and newspaper readers who have trouble distinguishing the relative importance of celebrity stories, like the death of Anna Nicole Smith, from other matters in the news, like the reconstitution of forces responsible for the devastating Sept. 11 attacks.

If air time is any guide, there’s no contest. It’s been obvious for the longest time that the line between news and entertainment has vanished. News is entertainment. And the death of Anna Nicole Smith is more entertaining — for the time being, at least — than the war in Iraq or the plodding machinations of bin Laden and Zawahri.

Paris Hilton and Britney Spears were on the cover of Newsweek last week with the headline “The Girls Gone Wild Effect.” When you turned to the story, there was a full-page picture of the former best friends, with a glassy-eyed Britney looking for all the world like a younger version of Anna Nicole Smith.

The lead-in to the article said in large type: “Paris, Britney, Lindsay and Nicole — They seem to be everywhere and they may not be wearing underwear.”

The nation may be at war, and Al Qaeda may be gearing up for a rematch. But that’s no fun, not when Britney is shaving off her hair and Jennifer Aniston is reported to have a new nose and the thrill-a-minute watch over Anna Nicole’s remains is still the hottest thing on TV.

It was Neil Postman who warned in 1985 that we were amusing ourselves to death. I’m not sure anyone knew how literally to take him.

More than 20 years later, the masses have nearly succeeded in drawing the curtains on anything that’s not entertaining. No one can figure out what do about Iraq or Al Qaeda. A great American cultural center like New Orleans was all but washed away, and no one knows how to put it back together. The ice caps are melting and Al Gore is traveling the land like the town crier, raising the alarm about global warming.

But none of that has really gotten the public’s attention. None of it is amusing enough. As a nation of spectators, we seem content to sit with a pizza and a brew in front of the high-def flat-screen TV, obsessing over Anna Nicole et al., and giving no thought to the possibility that the calamitous events unfolding in the world may someday reach our doorsteps.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)